I found this piece while I was reading news about the recent super typhoon Haiyan (locally known as Yolanda).
As I read this, I nod several times agreeing to the writer's opinion. My eyes almost teary as I reflect, not just as a Filipino, but as a human being in general that have survived and in the process of continuously surviving life's challenges and transforming myself to who I am right now.
I found this piece HERE but allow me to copy and share it here in my blog.
Commentary: Calling Filipinos resilient is an insult
~ by Ninotchka Rosc
The author of this piece, Ninotchka Rosca, works
as a literary writer and a journalist. She is also an activist,
advocating for women’s rights. She resides in New York City but lives in
the world.
It was difficult to see and hear those words repeated, in media
reports, articles, military and even White House briefings: “The Filipino
people are resilient.” A characterization which should raise anyone’s
hackles, with its image of a jelly blob, quivering when punched, then quieting
back to what it was before the rain of blows: sans sharpness, inert and
passive, non-evaluating of what happens to its self.
No, we are not resilient.
We break, when the world is just too much, and in the process of breaking, are
transformed into something difficult to understand. Or we take full
measure of misfortune, wrestle with it and emerge transformed into something
equally terrifying.
It is what is…and what isn’t
This is in sync with our
indigenous worldview, expressed by our riddles, the talinhaga, on which every
Filipino child used to be raised: an understanding of reality, including
ourselves, as metamorphic (or, capable of transformation).
A leaf by night; a bamboo by day – is how we
look at our buri mat. It is both what it is and isn’t.
And because this is a worldview which has to be
lived in situ, it is unfathomable to the outsider, despite scholarship and
analyses, which come up with nothing but the label “resilient.”
We don’t spring back, we transform
Across oceans and throughout the five continents of this Earth, we
carry the tales of our old heroes and muses, our elementals, who confront, in
each re-telling, tests of strength and spirit.
Some break, like Mariang Makiling who hides in a thousand-year
hibernation; others metamorphose, like Bernardo Carpio who becomes a
pillar of stone stopping cliffs from caving in on his village.
We may not remember their old names – names being the first to be erased under
colonialism – but we remember how they were and how we are supposed to
be: metamorphic.
What have we become after Yolanda?
These two legends represent the
twin possibilities for the Filipinos’ metamorphosis. Both are
inexplicable outside of the local paradigm. Just as what we’re watching
now in the aftermath of Typhoon Haiyan/Yolanda seems inexplicable.
Who can fathom what drives a woman to open body
bags of putrefying corpses in search of a husband, a son, a daughter? At
the end of a gaze that has lingered over a hundred dead faces, what is she now?
Who can measure the rage of the peaceable man
breaking through the walls of groceries, warehouses, shopping malls? And
having pierced both law and walls of Authority, what is he now?
The absence of thousands
To say that Filipinos are resilient is an
assurance for those who have imposed upon them – much and repeatedly.
It is to say to themselves that we shake off
tragedy much like ducks shaking off water.
It is to ignore
the monuments to what has been suffered: matchstick debris of houses, muck and
mud of vanished cities, stench of the dead and – oh! – the
absence, thousands of absence, of those who used to be in our midst. Who could be so resilient as not to be transformed by that?
No, we are not resilient.
We break, when the world is just too much, and in the process of breaking, are transformed into something difficult to understand. Or we take full measure of misfortune, wrestle with it and emerge transformed into something equally terrifying.
A leaf by night; a bamboo by day – is how we look at our buri mat. It is both what it is and isn’t.
And because this is a worldview which has to be lived in situ, it is unfathomable to the outsider, despite scholarship and analyses, which come up with nothing but the label “resilient.”
Some break, like Mariang Makiling who hides in a thousand-year hibernation; others metamorphose, like Bernardo Carpio who becomes a pillar of stone stopping cliffs from caving in on his village.
We may not remember their old names – names being the first to be erased under colonialism – but we remember how they were and how we are supposed to be: metamorphic.
Who can fathom what drives a woman to open body bags of putrefying corpses in search of a husband, a son, a daughter? At the end of a gaze that has lingered over a hundred dead faces, what is she now?
Who can measure the rage of the peaceable man breaking through the walls of groceries, warehouses, shopping malls? And having pierced both law and walls of Authority, what is he now?
It is to say to themselves that we shake off tragedy much like ducks shaking off water.
No comments:
Post a Comment